Case 1805928/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Steyert v Ravens Trailers Limited AT A HEARING — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805928/2021
- Decision date
- 10 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Steyert
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent, Ravens Trailers Limited, did not enter an appearance or attend the hearing. Employment Judge Lancaster sat alone at Leeds by CVP on 10 March 2022. The tribunal upheld the claimant's monetary claims arising out of employment and dismissal.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £5,760 gross. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £512 gross, calculated by reference to a £720 gross week's pay less 16 hours' earnings in mitigation at £13 per hour (£208).
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £842 gross, calculated at 76/365 x 5.6 weeks at £720 per week. The judgment states that the respondent must pay the claimant £7,114.40 in total.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent did not attend. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and awarded £5,760 gross. | Upheld | — | £5,760 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £512 gross, calculated from a £720 gross week's pay less 16 hours' earnings in mitigation at £13 per hour (£208). | Upheld | — | £512 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £842 gross, calculated at 76/365 x 5.6 weeks at £720 per week. The judgment states a total award of £7,114.40, which does not exactly match the stated component figures. | Upheld | — | £842 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,114
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.