Case 1805929/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Barnes v Capital Autobodys LLP — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805929/2022
- Decision date
- 10 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Barnes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal substituted Capital Autobodys LLP as the correct respondent, being satisfied that the claim form served on “Capital Autobodys” had come to the attention of Capital Autobodys LLP. The judgment was determined under Rule 21 on the available material. The Claimant’s claim for a redundancy payment was dismissed on withdrawal by him, and the hearing listed for 15 February 2023 was cancelled.
The tribunal also determined the Claimant’s claim for pay in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday. It found that claim well-founded and ordered the Respondent to pay £1,728 in lieu of 18 days’ accrued but untaken holiday. The judgment states that if any tax is payable on that sum, the Claimant is responsible for paying it.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the Claimant’s claim for a redundancy payment was dismissed on withdrawal by him. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claim for pay in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday well-founded and awarded £1,728 in respect of 18 days' accrued but untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £1,728 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,728
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,728
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.