Case 1805935/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Hussain v Curry’s Group Limited AT A PUBLIC PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2026
- Case reference
- 1805935/2025
- Decision date
- 5 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Hussain
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing in Leeds on 5 August 2026, Employment Judge Lancaster struck out Mr M Hussain’s claims for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination concerning a failure to make reasonable adjustments. The tribunal held that the claim was not in a form which could reasonably be responded to and/or had no reasonable prospect of success, and was no longer being actively pursued. The respondent’s name was amended from Currys Limited to Curry’s Group Limited.
The claimant’s then representatives submitted the claim on 9 September 2025 without any particulars. They requested permission to supply further information by 9 October 2025. Although that request received no reply, no particulars were provided by the proposed date or before the representatives came off the record on 20 January 2026. The respondent applied for strike-out, alternatively a deposit order, on 21 January 2026 and copied the application directly to the claimant.
The postponement direction and notice of the rescheduled hearing were mistakenly sent to the former representatives. However, the tribunal was satisfied that the respondent’s solicitors had made the claimant fully aware of the rescheduled proceedings since 17 February 2026. He supplied no particulars, did not communicate with the tribunal or the respondent’s solicitors despite their attempts to agree the hearing issues, and did not attend. No monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out together with the disability discrimination claim for the reasons given for the claim as a whole. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Alleged failure to make reasonable adjustments. Struck out together with the unfair dismissal claim. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Claim not in a form which can reasonably be responded to
- No reasonable prospect of success
- Claim no longer being actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.