Case 1805942/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Sharon Crookes Mrs Samantha Rose Ms Kirsty Dean v Amey Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805942/2021
- Decision date
- 26 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Sharon Crookes Mrs Samantha Rose Ms Kirsty Dean
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claims were issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunal on 26 November 2021. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time.
The Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The claims of unfair dismissal and breach of contract in respect of notice pay succeeded, with remedy to be determined at a separate Remedy Hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Rule 21 judgment states that the unfair dismissal claims succeed, with remedy to be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The Rule 21 judgment states that breach of contract claims in respect of notice pay succeed, with remedy to be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.