Case 1805951/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Proctor v Powells Bus Company Limited (in liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805951/2022
- Decision date
- 10 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Proctor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Powells Bus Company Limited (in liquidation) failed to comply with the requirements of sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. This was a Rule 21 judgment, so the decision was made on the papers rather than after a contested hearing.
The tribunal therefore made a protective award in favour of Ms J Proctor. The protected period was 90 days from 11 August 2022. The extracted text states that the Recoupment Regulations apply to the award.
No monetary figure for the protective award appears in the extracted text, so the amount payable cannot be stated from this source alone.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Rule 21 judgment finding the respondent failed to comply with sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The tribunal made a protective award for the claimant for the protected period of 90 days from 11 August 2022, but the extracted text does not state a monetary figure. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.