Case 1805954/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Lenham v Sensh Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805954/2021
- Decision date
- 17 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Lenham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Deeley Date determined that a determination could properly be made without a hearing, and the hearing listed for 27 January 2022 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that Sensh Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Miss S Lenham £282.80 gross, described in the judgment as approximately equivalent to £239.89 net.
In the notes, the tribunal recorded that the claimant had emailed on 13 January 2022 saying she had received a part payment of £1,300 in relation to a claim for £1,539.89 net. The tribunal said the gross award of £282.80 was calculated on the basis of the claimant’s October 2021 payslip.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £282.80 gross, approximately £239.89 net. The claimant had emailed that she had received a part payment of £1,300 in relation to a claim for £1,539.89 net. | Upheld | — | £283 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £283
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.