Case 1805955/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Shaffi v Capita plc — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805955/2021
- Decision date
- 17 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Shaffi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims of unfair dismissal, unauthorised deductions from wages, disability discrimination and race discrimination against Capita PLC.
The Tribunal dismissed all claims. It found that it did not have jurisdiction to consider them because they were presented outside the respective time limits for bringing those claims.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested at the hearing or within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the Tribunal found it did not have jurisdiction, the claim having been presented outside the applicable time limit. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as unauthorised deductions from wages. Dismissed because the Tribunal found it did not have jurisdiction, the claim having been presented outside the applicable time limit. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed because the Tribunal found it did not have jurisdiction, the claim having been presented outside the applicable time limit. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed because the Tribunal found it did not have jurisdiction, the claim having been presented outside the applicable time limit. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.