Case 1805980/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr MS Raj v Royal Mail Property and Facilities Solutions Limited AT A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805980/2022
- Decision date
- 17 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr MS Raj
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Lancaster in Leeds on 17 February 2023. The only complaint dealt with in the written judgment was the claimant's contention that the failure to award him a pay rise from April 2022 formed part of his claim for unauthorised deduction from wages.
The tribunal held that that complaint had no reasonable prospect of success and dismissed it. No monetary remedy was recorded in the judgment, and the written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | At a preliminary hearing, the tribunal held that the complaint that the failure to award a pay rise from April 2022 formed part of the claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim had no reasonable prospect of success. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.