Case 1805991/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Stephen Frost v H.E.C. Contracting Limited AT A HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805991/2023
- Decision date
- 6 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- J Blesic, DW Fields
Parties
2 namedStephen Frost
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Lancaster, sitting with members J Blesic and DW Fields, declared that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. The complaints of breach of contract (notice pay) and holiday pay were dismissed upon withdrawal, and the complaints of direct disability discrimination and discrimination because of something arising in consequence of disability were dismissed.
The basic award (5 x 1.5 weeks' pay capped at £571 = £4,282.50) was extinguished by a redundancy payment already made of £5,139. The compensatory award was calculated at three additional weeks' net pay of £580 each (£1,740) representing four further weeks before dismissal less one week already overpaid in lieu of the five weeks' notice due. After deducting the £856.50 excess of the redundancy payment, the net award was £883.50. The recoupment provisions did not apply, and the respondent's application for costs was refused.
Claims and outcomes
5 claims adjudicated| Claim type | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Upheld | — | £884 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £884
- Basic award
- £0
- Compensatory award
- £884
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.