Case 1805993/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms R Page (solicitor) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805993/2022
- Decision date
- 5 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a telephone hearing in Leeds on 31 March 2023 before Employment Judge Davies, with the Claimant appearing in person and Ms R Page for the Respondents, the tribunal recorded that the claims against the First Respondent were dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. The judgment does not set out any merits findings on those claims.
The tribunal also recorded that the age discrimination claim against the Second Respondent was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. No compensation or other remedy was awarded in this judgment.
The judgment further states that the remaining claims would be heard in accordance with case management orders made on the same day.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claims against the First Respondent were dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant, but it does not specify the underlying claim type(s). | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The age discrimination claim against the Second Respondent was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.