Case 1806011/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Winterbottom v Bridge-It Housing UK Team Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1806011/2022
- Decision date
- 21 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Winterbottom
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint. It had given Mr Winterbottom an opportunity by letter dated 1 December 2022 to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The reasons state that the claimant did not have two years' service for an unfair dismissal claim. The Tribunal also recorded that he failed to make written representations, or failed to make any sufficient representations, explaining why strike out should not follow, or to request a hearing.
The judgment records that the unfair dismissal complaint was therefore struck out. The Tribunal added that the claimant's remaining claim was still to be listed for hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the Tribunal considered the claim had no reasonable prospect of success; the reasons state the claimant did not have two years' service for an unfair dismissal claim and did not make sufficient representations against strike out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.