Case 1806028/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Stefanek v Mach Recruitment Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1806028/2022
- Decision date
- 22 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rogerson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Stefanek
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that, by letter dated 24 February 2023, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 12 December 2022 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The Tribunal found that the claimant had failed to make written representations, or any sufficient representations, explaining why strike out should not occur, and had not requested a hearing. The hearing listed for 3 April 2023 was therefore vacated.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was struck out; the specific pleaded heads are not set out in the judgment text, but the listing categories identify unfair dismissal. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim was struck out; the specific pleaded heads are not set out in the judgment text, but the listing categories identify breach of contract. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Listed as written pay statement. The locked taxonomy has no specific written pay statement category, so this is classified as other. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.