Case 1806037/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Wheater v Perrys Motor Sales Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1806037/2020
- Decision date
- 9 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Wheater
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that two complaints were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant: discrimination arising from disability relating to events in July 2019 under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010, and complaints of failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010. The judgment does not record any findings on the merits of those withdrawn complaints.
The judgment also states that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal and discrimination arising from disability relating to the termination of his employment were not withdrawn and were proceeding to a final hearing. No substantive determination of those claims or any remedy was made in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of discrimination arising from disability relating to events in July 2019 (section 15 Equality Act 2010) was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaints of failure to make reasonable adjustments (sections 20/21 Equality Act 2010) were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.