Case 1806040/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Hamid v Wm Morrisons Supermarkets Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1806040/2018
- Decision date
- 7 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Hamid
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant had been ordered to pay a deposit of £200 following a preliminary hearing on 19 September 2018. The order was sent to the claimant on 20 September 2018, but the claimant did not pay the deposit.
The tribunal struck out the complaints of direct discrimination and victimisation concerning delays in the conduct of the grievance procedure under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment recorded that the hearing listed for 11 February 2019 would still take place to determine the remaining complaints.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment identifies a complaint of direct discrimination but does not state the protected characteristic in the extracted judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Victimisation | The victimisation complaint concerned delays in the conduct of the grievance procedure and was struck out for non-payment of the deposit. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.