Case 1806078/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Grimes v Dezrez Services Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 1806078/2018
- Decision date
- 2 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Grimes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 30 July 2018, the tribunal ordered the claimant, Miss K Grimes, to pay a deposit of £250 in respect of each of her seven allegations of direct disability discrimination and sex discrimination. The deposit order was sent on 2 August 2018.
The claimant did not pay the deposits. The tribunal therefore struck out the complaints of direct disability discrimination and direct sex discrimination under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records no determination of the underlying merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination complaint struck out after the claimant failed to pay the £250 deposit ordered in respect of each of her seven allegations. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination complaint struck out after the claimant failed to pay the £250 deposit ordered in respect of each of her seven allegations. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.