Case 1806083/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Hussain v Pennine GP Alliance Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 1806083/2025
- Decision date
- 3 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Hussain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge JM Wade heard Mr I Hussain's case against Pennine GP Alliance Limited by CVP at Leeds on 3 August 2026. The tribunal found that the claimant was not a disabled person during January to September 2025, the material period for these claims.
The tribunal consequently dismissed the claimant's Section 15 and reasonable adjustment complaints. It gave summary reasons, but the written judgment does not set out further findings explaining the disability determination. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Section 15 complaint dismissed because the claimant was not a disabled person during the material period, January to September 2025. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Reasonable adjustment complaints dismissed because the claimant was not a disabled person during the material period, January to September 2025. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 15
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.