Case 1806115/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Jenny v Flamelily Care Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1806115/2024
- Decision date
- 11 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Jenny
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short Rule 22 judgment signed by Employment Judge Maidment on 11 June 2025. The tribunal recorded that Flamelily Care Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr A Jenny’s wages and ordered it to pay him the gross sum of £6,682.02. It also found that he had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £592.80 gross damages.
The tribunal further held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,369.60 gross. In addition, pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, it ordered a further £2,371.20, described as four weeks’ pay, for failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment. The total gross sum ordered was £12,015.62.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum stated in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £6,682 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages in the gross sum stated. | Upheld | — | £593 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum stated. | Upheld | — | £2,370 |
| Other | The tribunal ordered an additional sum of four weeks’ pay pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment. | Upheld | — | £2,371 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,016
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.