Loading…

Mr A Wanis v Royal Mail Group Limited — Employment Tribunal 2019 | Tribunal Watch

Case 1806134/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Mr A Wanis v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2019

Case reference: 1806134/2018
Decision date: 27 February 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Rostant Dated

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr A Wanis

Respondent

Royal Mail Group Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment concerned only part of the claim. The tribunal struck out the claimant's allegations or arguments that he suffered discrimination because of race.

The reason given was that orders dated 7 January 2019 and 4 February 2019 required the claimant to pay a deposit of 346.00 by 21 February 2019, and the claimant failed to comply with that order. The judgment stated that the claimant's remaining claims remained listed for hearing on 8 March 2019.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Race discrimination	The judgment struck out the claimant's allegations or arguments that he suffered discrimination because of race after non-compliance with a deposit order. Other remaining claims were not determined in this judgment.	Struck out	Race	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.