Case 1806227/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Laura Ashley Ltd (In Administration) and others — 2021
- Case reference
- 1806227/2020
- Decision date
- 13 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant was employed by Laura Ashley Limited, which changed its name to AL Realisations Limited on 22 April 2020, and that both names related to the same entity. The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy on 2 October 2020.
By consent, the tribunal recorded that the claimant was assigned to an establishment where 20 or more redundancies were proposed within 90 days, and that the First and Second Respondents did not fully inform and consult with the claimant in accordance with sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The tribunal made a protective award for a protected period of 35 days beginning on the termination date, capped at the amount payable by the Redundancy Payments Service and subject to deductions required by law.
The judgment states that there was no order for costs or fees, that each party was to bear their own costs and fees, and that the claim listed in the schedule was extinguished in its entirety by the consent judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Consent judgment on a complaint under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 seeking a protective award for failure to inform and consult under sections 188 and 188A. Classified as other because the taxonomy has no specific protective award category and the claim was not for redundancy pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.188 and s.188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.