Case 1806228/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Petersen v Hair Tools Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 1806228/2017
- Decision date
- 6 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Petersen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy an order sent to the parties on 6 November 2018, the proceedings were stayed until further order. The parties were told that no further action would be taken unless the claimant applied to restore the case to the hearing list and provided evidence, including medical evidence, explaining why he had not been able to pursue the proceedings up to that point, together with a statement that he was now able actively to pursue the case to a conclusion.
There was no response from either party. The tribunal found that the claim was not being actively pursued and, accordingly, struck out the complaints. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the merits of the underlying complaint(s), and no monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying complaint(s) beyond referring to 'the complaints'; they were struck out under rule 37 for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.