Case 1806264/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Sajek v Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1806264/2020
- Decision date
- 17 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Sajek
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records that Mr M Sajek brought claims for unpaid holiday pay, unfair dismissal, and damages for failure to give notice of termination against Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Ltd. The hearing took place in Leeds on 10 and 11 May 2021 before Employment Judge Cox.
The holiday pay claim did not proceed to determination because it was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. The separate claim for damages for failure to give notice of termination failed.
The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal claim, but it recorded that it awarded no compensation for that dismissal. The extracted judgment does not set out any further monetary breakdown.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that the claim for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim succeeded, but the tribunal recorded that it awarded no compensation for that dismissal. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim for damages for failure to give notice of termination failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.