Case 1806347/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. M Swailes v Muller UK & Ireland Group LLP T/a Muller Milk & Ingredients — 2021
- Case reference
- 1806347/2020
- Decision date
- 15 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. M Swailes
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place by CVP on 22 February and 15 March 2021 before Employment Judge Buckley. The judgment records that the claimant, Mr M Swailes, brought an unfair dismissal claim against Muller UK & Ireland Group LLP t/a Muller Milk & Ingredients, and that the claim succeeded.
The tribunal awarded a basic award of £5,930.50 and a compensatory award of £350 for loss of statutory rights. It expressly recorded that there was no award for loss of earnings, and that the recoupment regulations did not apply.
Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons was made within the stated period. The judgment therefore contains the outcome and remedy only, without a fuller written analysis of the dismissal finding.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim succeeded. It awarded a basic award of £5,930.50 and a compensatory award of £350 for loss of statutory rights, with no award for loss of earnings. Recoupment regulations did not apply. | Upheld | — | £6,281 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,281
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £5,931
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £350
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.