Case 1806392/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Abdoubaki v Frazer Harvey Associates Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1806392/2019
- Decision date
- 2 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Appearances
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Abdoubaki
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr R Abdoubaki brought claims against Frazer Harvey Associates Ltd for unauthorised deduction from wages, outstanding holiday pay, and breach of contract. At a hearing in Hull on 2 January 2020 before Employment Judge Shepherd, the tribunal held that the claims for unauthorised deduction from wages and outstanding holiday pay were not well-founded and dismissed them.
The tribunal upheld the breach of contract claim in respect of outstanding expenses at the effective date of termination of the claimant's employment. It ordered the respondent to pay Mr Abdoubaki £1,842.40 in respect of that claim.
No separate award was recorded for the dismissed wage or holiday pay claims, and the judgment does not record any other remedy components such as interest or a separate compensatory or basic award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages was not well-founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claim for outstanding holiday pay was not well-founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim for breach of contract in respect of outstanding expenses at the effective date of termination succeeded. | Upheld | — | £1,842 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,842
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.