Case 1806444/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Mr T Taylor, Solicitor — 2020
- Case reference
- 1806444/2019
- Decision date
- 25 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds on 18 February 2020 before Employment Judge Shulman. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr T Taylor, Solicitor. The written judgment states that the claimant's claims for a redundancy payment, no notice pay, no holiday pay and 'other payment' were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
No findings were made on the merits of those claims. The record does not identify any financial award, and it does not set out any legal test or substantive reasoning beyond recording that the claims were withdrawn and dismissed. Written reasons were not provided because reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment records this claim as dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | This is the claim described in the judgment as 'no notice pay'; it was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records this claim as dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | This is the claim described in the judgment as 'other payment'; it was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.