Case 1806470/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Young v Rutherford Vending Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1806470/2024
- Decision date
- 22 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Young
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claims were determined under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Davies decided a determination could properly be made on that basis. The claimant had not brought an unfair dismissal claim and was not entitled to compensation for lost earnings following dismissal, save in respect of notice pay.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages covering the period from March 2024 until his dismissal by text on 28 May 2024, awarding £3,603.60. The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice pay; with a 12-week statutory notice entitlement, damages of £5,148 were awarded. The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £12,870.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, with the amount to be determined once further information was provided. It also found that the respondent breached an implied term of the contract by deducting employees' pension contributions from the claimant's wages without paying them into his pension over a 9-month period, ordering payment of £742.14.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages from March 2024 to dismissal on 28 May 2024 (8 weeks and 2 days at £429 per week). | Upheld | — | £3,604 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for notice pay (12 weeks statutory notice entitlement); contractual one month's notice not additionally awarded. | Upheld | — | £5,148 |
| Redundancy | Claimant dismissed by reason of redundancy. | Upheld | — | £12,870 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement; amount payable to be determined once the claimant has provided further information. | Other | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach of implied term: pension contributions deducted from wages but not paid into pension for 9 months (June 2023 to March 2024). | Upheld | — | £742 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £22,364
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.