Mr M Imran v Dixon’s Carphone — 2019

Case reference: 1806472/2019
Decision date: 18 December 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Maidment

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr M Imran

Respondent

Dixon’s Carphone

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52. The extracted judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Mr M Imran, against Dixon’s Carphone.

No substantive liability findings are recorded in the extracted text, and no remedy was awarded. The judgment is limited to the procedural dismissal after withdrawal and does not identify the underlying claims or resolve them on their merits.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment records only that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No substantive claims or merits findings are set out in the extracted text.	Withdrawn	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.