Case 1806482/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person (accompanied by Mrs L George of Support through Court) v Guthra Saiprasad — 2019
- Case reference
- 1806482/2019
- Decision date
- 30 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Little REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person (accompanied by Mrs L George of Support through Court)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dealt with the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint at a preliminary stage and struck it out for want of jurisdiction. Employment Judge Little held that the claimant had not completed the two years' qualifying period required for an unfair dismissal claim under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The judgment records that the unfair dismissal complaint therefore could not proceed. It also states that the complaints of harassment related to sex and direct sex discrimination were not determined by this judgment and would continue to be heard on their merits in due course.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction; the claimant did not have the two years' qualifying period required by section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Rights Act 1996, section 108
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.