Case 1806519/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Yorkshire Recovery Hud Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1806519/2019
- Decision date
- 2 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Leeds on 2 January 2020, Employment Judge T R Smith heard the claim of Mr A Merchant, who appeared in person. The respondent, Yorkshire Recovery Hud Ltd, did not attend. The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages.
The judgment states that the sum of £3,327.50 was due for non-payment of four weeks' wages plus non-payment of notice. In addition, the tribunal awarded £7 for financial loss attributable to the non-payment of wages, described as an overdraft charge.
The total sum payable by the respondent was £3,334.50. No discrimination, dismissal, or other claims are recorded in the judgment, and no separate remedy breakdown beyond the wages deduction and the consequential £7 loss is given.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages. It ordered £3,327.50 for non-payment of four weeks' wages plus notice, and a further £7 for an overdraft charge attributable to the non-payment. | Upheld | — | £3,335 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,335
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.