Case 1806538/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Anderson v Origin Fine Foods Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1806538/2022
- Decision date
- 14 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge James Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 2 December 2022. The respondent presented a valid response on time, but indicated that it did not intend to defend the claim. The Employment Judge therefore made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without a contested hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered the respondent to pay Miss R Anderson the gross sum of £486.05.
The listed hearing on 6 March 2023 was cancelled because the case was determined on the papers under rule 21.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent presented a valid response but stated it did not intend to defend the claim. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £486.05. | Upheld | — | £486 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £486
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.