Case 1806546/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Kennish v Luminate Education Group — 2023
- Case reference
- 1806546/2022
- Decision date
- 13 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Kennish
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Miss L Kennish brought a complaint of automatic unfair dismissal against Luminate Education Group. Following a preliminary hearing on 23 August 2023, the tribunal ordered her to pay a deposit of £40.00 and sent the order the same day.
The claimant did not pay the deposit. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the complaint of automatic unfair dismissal under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. No merits hearing took place.
The judgment also states that the hearing fixed for 22 and 23 January 2024 would not go ahead. No compensation or other remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was described as a complaint of automatic unfair dismissal. It was struck out under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claimant did not pay the £40 deposit ordered after the preliminary hearing on 23 August 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.