Case 1806576/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Yorkshire Freight Worldwide Ltd and Yorkshire Freight Company Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1806576/2020
- Decision date
- 4 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Little REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge Little at Sheffield by telephone on 21 January 2021, with the claimant represented by his wife and the respondents represented by Mr N Waite and Mr M Nelson. By consent, the first respondent was discharged from the proceedings on the basis that it did not employ the claimant.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaint in respect of holiday pay. It recorded that, although the claimant had initially been paid at the rate of 80% for some Bank Holidays while furloughed, the second respondent made payment of the necessary 20% top-up for the Bank Holidays in respect of which he claimed underpayment.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment. The only substantive outcome is dismissal of the holiday pay complaint, following the payment of the sums said to have been underpaid.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the complaint in respect of holiday pay was dismissed. It also records that the second respondent had paid the outstanding 20% top-up for the Bank Holidays in respect of which the claimant alleged underpayment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.