Case 1806580/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Bang Phan v Bento Box t/a Little Tokyo Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1806580/2019
- Decision date
- 17 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Bang Phan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Miss Bang Phan's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages succeeded in part. It found that the respondent had unlawfully deducted £1,647.80 from her wages, calculated by reference to 214 hours of work at the relevant national minimum wage rate of £7.70 per hour.
The tribunal did not determine the whole of the claim at this hearing. It recorded that the balance of the claim, namely £371.52 in respect of 48.25 hours of work at £7.70 per hour, would be determined at the final hearing of the claim. The respondent was ordered to pay £1,647.80 to the claimant on or before 3 July 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint succeeded in part. The tribunal awarded £1,647.80 for 214 hours of work at £7.70 per hour, and left the balance claimed (£371.52 for 48.25 hours) to be determined at the final hearing. | Upheld | — | £1,648 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,648
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.