Case 1806590/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1806590/2019
- Decision date
- 19 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain Representation
- Venue
- Sheffield
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant was paid £380 net per week, equivalent to £480 gross per week.
It found that the claimant suffered an unlawful deduction from wages because the respondent failed to pay him for work undertaken during the last week of his employment. It awarded £480 gross for that deduction.
It also found that the claimant was wrongfully dismissed because he was summarily dismissed in circumstances where he was entitled to one week's notice. It awarded £480 gross as damages for wrongful dismissal, making a total award of £960.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant suffered an unlawful deduction from wages for the last week of employment and awarded the gross amount of £480. | Upheld | — | £480 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was wrongfully dismissed because he was summarily dismissed when entitled to one week's notice, and awarded £480 damages. | Upheld | — | £480 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £960
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.