Case 1806595/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Kidson v Merrie England Coffee Shops Limited PUBLIC PRELIMINARY HEARING Heard: In Leeds — 2022
- Case reference
- 1806595/2021
- Decision date
- 11 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Kidson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing on 10 February 2022 before Employment Judge JM Wade in Leeds, Miss D Kidson's complaints of unfair dismissal, race discrimination, redundancy payment, notice pay, holiday pay, arrears of pay, other payments, and a mental health act complaint were struck out. The published judgment records that the complaints were either not pursued or had no reasonable prospects of success.
The decision does not set out the detailed reasons in the published text. It states that the reasons for the strike out were announced to the parties at the hearing and are contained in a case management order. No remedy was awarded in the judgment published on the GOV.UK database.
Claims and outcomes
8 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out at a public preliminary hearing as either not pursued or having no reasonable prospects of success; the published judgment does not allocate a reason to this complaint individually. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Struck out at a public preliminary hearing as either not pursued or having no reasonable prospects of success; the published judgment does not allocate a reason to this complaint individually. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Redundancy | Struck out at a public preliminary hearing as either not pursued or having no reasonable prospects of success; the published judgment does not allocate a reason to this complaint individually. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | This is the published 'notice pay' complaint. It was struck out at a public preliminary hearing as either not pursued or having no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Struck out at a public preliminary hearing as either not pursued or having no reasonable prospects of success; the published judgment does not allocate a reason to this complaint individually. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | This is the published 'arrears of pay' complaint. It was struck out at a public preliminary hearing as either not pursued or having no reasonable prospects of success. |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.