Case 1806602/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Wilson-Theaker of Counsel (instructed by Bhayani HR and Employment Law) v Generator Power Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1806602/2019
- Decision date
- 29 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Little REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Wilson-Theaker of Counsel (instructed by Bhayani HR and Employment Law)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs M Ferris was found to have been dismissed by Generator Power Limited, and the tribunal held that the dismissal was unfair. The tribunal also found that the claimant did not contribute to the dismissal.
The tribunal awarded a basic award of £3,150. The compensatory award was £6,194.88, made up of 9 weeks' loss of pay at £650.34 per week (£5,853.06) and pension loss for the same period at £37.98 per week (£341.82).
The tribunal further held that it was just and equitable to make an uplift under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. For that purpose, the week's pay was capped at £525, producing an uplift of £1,050, and the total award payable forthwith was £10,394.88.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed and that the dismissal was unfair. It also found that the claimant did not contribute to the dismissal. The award included a basic award, compensatory award, and an uplift under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £10,395 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,395
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,150
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £6,195
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Act 2002 section 38
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.