Case 1806605/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Holmes v Imotika Ltd This has been a remote hearing, by telephone (A): A hearing in person was not practicable because of the present restrictions due to Covid 19. — 2021
- Case reference
- 1806605/2020
- Decision date
- 19 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge D N Jones heard the case remotely by telephone and gave judgment on 19 January 2021. The claimant, Mr M Holmes, succeeded on his claim for untaken holiday leave at the termination of employment. The tribunal ordered Imotika Ltd to pay £983.38 gross in respect of that holiday entitlement.
The tribunal also found that the respondent was in breach of contract because it had failed to pay the claimant for time worked and money owed in lieu for 10 days. Damages for that breach were assessed at £1,080.60 gross. The judgment does not record any additional remedy heads beyond those two sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £983.38 gross for untaken holiday leave at the termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £983 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a breach of contract in failing to pay the claimant for time worked and owed in lieu for 10 days, and awarded £1,080.60 gross damages. | Upheld | — | £1,081 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,064
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.