Case 1806605/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Hamer v Mayfair Residential Care Home Ltd PUBLIC HEARING Heard: BY CVP On: 21 August 2023 — 2023
- Case reference
- 1806605/2022
- Decision date
- 21 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Hamer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a final CVP hearing on 21 August 2023 after an earlier hearing in May had not been able to determine the claims. Employment Judge JM Wade recorded that by the morning of the hearing it was clear the claims were agreed by the respondent, and the tribunal determined the correct employer as Mayfair Residential Care Home Ltd.
The tribunal held that Mrs D Hamer was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £6,842.34. It also upheld her complaint of unlawful deduction from wages and awarded gross sums of £646.80 for holiday pay on termination of employment and £4,561.56 for notice pay.
The total sum payable to the claimant was £12,050.70. The judgment notes that reasons for the decision were given at the hearing and that typed written reasons could be requested separately.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded. | Upheld | — | £6,842 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld for gross sums of £646.80 holiday pay on termination of employment and £4,561.56 notice pay. | Upheld | — | £5,208 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,051
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.