Case 1806608/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B Davidson v Lighthouse School AT A HEARING — 2022
- Case reference
- 1806608/2021
- Decision date
- 12 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B Davidson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds by CVP video conference on 12 May 2022 before Employment Judge Lancaster, with Miss Davidson appearing in person and Lighthouse School represented by Ms T Hand, counsel. The written record states that Miss Davidson was, at all material times, a disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010.
The extracted judgment does not set out any further finding on liability or any monetary remedy. It records that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The extracted record states that the claimant was, at all material times, a disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010, but it does not record any final liability outcome or remedy. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.