Case 1806617/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Downey (counsel) For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1806617/2019
- Decision date
- 30 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Ms BR Hodgkinson, Mr J Howarth
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr R Downey (counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningFollowing the liability judgment dated 10 May 2022, the tribunal heard remedy evidence on 16 and 19 June 2023. It dealt with two upheld complaints: unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability, arising from the reduction of the claimant's pay to half pay between 16 July 2019 and 17 September 2019, and victimisation by instigating the Trust and Confidence process on 3 January 2020.
The parties agreed the pay shortfall for July to September 2019 was £3,411.45 net, with £1,030.28 interest. The tribunal grossed that sum up at 20% and awarded £4,264.30. On victimisation, it found that the instigation and continuation of the process caused the claimant's sick leave from March 2020 and the termination of her employment on 20 November 2020; there was no chance her employment would have ended on ill-health grounds in any event. It accepted that she had to give credit for post-termination earnings and pay in lieu of notice, and awarded £20,793.81 for lost earnings to termination, £3,586.93 for loss of earnings after termination, and interest on those sums.
For injury to feelings the tribunal applied the Vento framework and awarded £35,000, taking account of the fact that some of the claimant's distress related to matters not upheld in the liability judgment. It also found a moderate psychiatric injury, accepted Dr Cullen's assessment that 80% of that divisible harm was attributable to victimisation, and awarded £15,256 plus £13,834.85 interest. The tribunal found no future financial loss because the claimant's full pension and likely future earnings exceeded the salary she would have earned had she remained employed, and the total award was £96,424.59.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct award of £4,264.30 grossed up at 20%, plus £1,030.28 interest, for the agreed pay shortfall between 16 July 2019 and 17 September 2019. The shared injury-to-feelings and psychiatric injury awards were made across both upheld complaints. | Upheld | Disability | £5,295 |
| Victimisation | Direct award of £20,793.81 for lost earnings to 20 November 2020, £2,289.71 interest, £3,586.93 for loss of earnings after termination, and £368.71 interest. The shared injury-to-feelings and psychiatric injury awards were made across both upheld complaints. | Upheld | — | £27,039 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £96,425
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- Vento v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police (No 2)
- 2019 Presidential Guidance on Employment Tribunal Awards for Injury to Feelings
- Employment Tribunal (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases) Regulations 1996
- Sheriff v Klyne Tugs (Lowestoft) Ltd
- Essa v Laing
- BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd v Konczak
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.