Case 1806620/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person v C Box Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1806620/2019
- Decision date
- 24 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley On
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld Miss Anwar's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages. It declared that the claimant had suffered the deductions and awarded gross sums of £385 for notice pay, £371.50 for holiday pay, and £7.70 for one hour's work on 21 October 2019, giving a total award of £764.20.
The respondent did not attend the hearing on 24 January 2020. The notes record that the respondent had also failed to attend the original listing on 6 January 2020, had emailed on that date referring to a personal emergency, and then failed to provide the tribunal with the ordered details and evidence about that emergency or the earlier absence. The tribunal also noted that the respondent contacted the tribunal after the second hearing had already started, saying it had not received the notice of hearing but had received other correspondence.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim succeeded for unauthorised deductions from wages. The tribunal awarded gross amounts of £385 for notice pay, £371.50 for holiday pay, and £7.70 for one hour's work on 21 October 2019, totalling £764.20. | Upheld | — | £764 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £764
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.