Case 1806625/2021 · Employment Tribunal
in person v BLE Lighting and Power Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1806625/2021
- Decision date
- 13 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley On
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Leeds, sitting by CVP before Employment Judge Deeley on 13 January 2022, heard Mr P Caveney's application for interim relief against BLE Lighting and Power Limited. Both parties appeared in person. The written judgment records only the interim relief application and not the merits of any underlying claim.
The tribunal rejected the claimant's application for interim relief under ss128 and 129 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The background to the decision was said to be set out in the Tribunal's case management summary document of 13 January 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Application for interim relief under ss128-129 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The written judgment records that the application was rejected; it does not finally determine the underlying claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s128 ERA 1996
- s129 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.