Case 1806625/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Brook v Sarah Marie Clarke T/A The Barber’s Shop PUBLIC PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 1806625/2022
- Decision date
- 17 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Brook
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing in Leeds on 17 May 2023, Employment Judge Shepherd heard Ms D Brook's claim against Sarah Marie Clarke T/A The Barber's Shop. The only claim identified in the judgment was for unpaid holiday pay.
The Tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim. It found that the claim had not been presented within three months beginning with the date of the last unpaid holiday pay claimed, and it was not satisfied that it had not been reasonably practicable for the claim to be presented within that time.
On that basis, the unpaid holiday claim was dismissed. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Public preliminary hearing. The Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear the unpaid holiday claim because it was not presented within three months beginning with the date of the last unpaid holiday pay claimed, and it was not satisfied that presentation in time had not been reasonably practicable. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.