Case 1806626/2019 · Employment Tribunal
1. Mrs S Hopkins 2. Miss D Cook 3. Mr C Hagan v Superbreak Mini-Holidays Limited (In administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1806626/2019
- Decision date
- 4 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
1. Mrs S Hopkins 2. Miss D Cook 3. Mr C Hagan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent's administrators consented to continuation of the proceedings, and the responses had already been dismissed on 24 February 2020 under rule 28. Sitting under Rule 21, the tribunal declared that the claims for protective awards by Mrs S Hopkins, Miss D Cook and Mr C Hagan were well founded.
It found that the claimants had been dismissed as redundant and that the respondent had failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. A protective award was therefore made in favour of the claimants for a period of 90 days commencing on 1 August 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award claim for Mrs S Hopkins, Miss D Cook and Mr C Hagan. The tribunal held the claims well founded and made a protective award for a 90-day period commencing on 1 August 2019; no monetary amount was stated in the judgment text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21
- rule 28
- s.188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.