Case 1806634/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Jackson v Health Innovations (UK) Limited Heard: Remotely (in public by telephone) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1806634/2020
- Decision date
- 5 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Jackson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr C Jackson brought claims of unfair dismissal, automatically unfair dismissal because of a relevant transfer under regulation 7 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, and failure to inform and consult under regulation 13 of the same Regulations. The case was heard remotely by telephone on 5 March 2021 before Employment Judge S Shore.
The judgment states that all three claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. No findings were made on the merits of the claims, and the judgment records no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed upon withdrawal; the judgment records no merits findings on this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | Claim for automatically unfair dismissal because of a relevant transfer under regulation 7 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006; dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | Claim for failure to inform and consult under regulation 13 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006; dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.