Case 1806638/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Handley v Listers Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1806638/2021
- Decision date
- 17 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. Handley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Handley, did not attend the hearing on 17 March 2022 at Leeds by CVP. The tribunal noted that it had received no correspondence from the claimant since the ET1, that the respondent had received no response to its correspondence, and that the clerk had telephoned the claimant and left a message without reply. The tribunal waited until 14.25 before starting the hearing and had no information before it about the reasons for the claimant's absence.
In those circumstances, Employment Judge Buckley decided that it was in the interests of justice to dismiss the claimant's claims. The judgment records that the claims for breach of contract and unlawful deductions from wages were dismissed. The respondent's counterclaim was not determined in this judgment; the tribunal noted that the claimant had not yet been given an opportunity to file a response and that the issue was dealt with in a separate case management order.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed because the claimant did not attend the hearing and had not communicated with the tribunal since the ET1. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the claimant did not attend the hearing and the tribunal had no information about any reason for the absence. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.