Case 1806640/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Ashby v Whitewell Logistics Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1806640/2021
- Decision date
- 30 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Ashby
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Lancaster amended the respondent’s name to Whitewell Logistics Limited and dealt with the claim on the papers. The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,144.00 gross, calculated as 8 days at 13 hours at £11 per hour. It noted that the ET1 contained a typographical error showing the figure as £1,114.
The tribunal also stated that it had no jurisdiction simply to award further compensation for having to take Mr Holmes to an Employment Tribunal. The hearing listed for 13 April 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment of £1,144.00 gross for unpaid holiday entitlement, calculated as 8 days at 13 hours at £11 per hour. It also said it had no jurisdiction simply to award further compensation for having to take Mr Holmes to an Employment Tribunal. | Upheld | — | £1,144 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,144
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.