Case 1806662/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr T Ellis, paralegal — 2024
- Case reference
- 1806662/2023
- Decision date
- 14 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge James Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss K Norde brought a claim for unpaid wages against Nationwide Renewables Ltd. The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant only; the respondent gave no witness evidence and produced no documents. The issues were whether the claimant was an employee or worker, whether she had been underpaid during her employment, and what sums remained due.
The tribunal found that, although the claimant signed a contract for services, the label did not reflect the true agreement between the parties. It accepted her evidence that her manager regularly checked in on her and her team, monitored progress, and offered guidance on sales targets. The respondent also used a tracking system for sales, and the claimant was given equipment, including computers, microphones, headsets, and a company email address. The tribunal concluded that she was at least a worker and therefore entitled to bring a wages claim.
On the wage claim itself, the tribunal accepted that £519.75 was due for July 2023 and noted that the respondent accepted that sum. For August 2023, the tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence, including SDR tracker spreadsheets, tables of hours worked between 1 and 16 August 2023, and qualifying callbacks, and found on the balance of probabilities that she had worked 33.25 hours at £10.50 per hour, producing a further £349.13. Judgment was therefore entered for unpaid wages totalling £868.88.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the claim for unpaid wages and ordered payment of £519.75 for July 2023 and £349.13 for August 2023, totalling £868.88. | Upheld | — | £869 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £869
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.230 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Autoclenz v Belcher
- Uber v Aslam
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.