Case 1806665/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Hill v Intelligent PMI Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1806665/2020
- Decision date
- 28 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Hill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Hill brought a holiday pay claim against Intelligent PMI Ltd. The reasons record that he had been part of the initial furlough scheme under the Government's Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme and was claiming outstanding holiday pay, or compensation for accrued paid annual leave.
At the hearing on 28 January 2021, before Employment Judge Parkin sitting alone, the parties reached terms of settlement after discussion with the Judge. The tribunal therefore did not determine the merits of the holiday pay claim.
By consent, the judgment stayed all further proceedings. It provided that, unless either party applied by 11 March 2021 for the proceedings to continue and the hearing to be re-listed, the claim would be dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant on that date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claimant said he was on the initial furlough scheme under the Government's Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme and claimed outstanding holiday pay, or compensation for accrued paid annual leave. At the hearing the parties agreed terms of settlement, and the tribunal stayed further proceedings by consent. The judgment states that unless either party applied by 11 March 2021 for the proceedings to continue and the hearing to be re-listed, the claim would be dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant on that date. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.