Case 1806666/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Crawshaw v Mayfair Residential Care Home Ltd PUBLIC HEARING Heard: BY CVP On: 21 August 2023 — 2023
- Case reference
- 1806666/2022
- Decision date
- 21 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Crawshaw
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe final hearing proceeded by CVP before Employment Judge JM Wade after an earlier May hearing had not determined the claims and case management orders were made instead. By the start of the August hearing, the parties had agreed the claimant’s calculations save for the correct holiday year and the effect of that issue on holiday pay. The claimant accepted a holiday year beginning on 1 April. She did not pursue a preparation time order, and interest before judgment was not pursued. The tribunal also determined that Mayfair Residential Care Home Ltd was the correct employer.
Judgment was entered for the claimant on the remaining monetary claims. She was awarded a statutory redundancy payment of £1,242.40. Her complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was upheld, with gross awards of £638.36 for holiday pay on termination and £1,406.75 for notice pay. The total payable to the claimant was £3,288.01.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £1,242.40. | Upheld | — | £1,242 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award comprised holiday pay on termination of £638.36 and notice pay of £1,406.75. | Upheld | — | £2,045 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,288
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.