Case 1806667/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Shakeel v J&R Fourcourt Ltd and 2 others — 2025
- Case reference
- 1806667/2024
- Decision date
- 16 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bright
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr M Shakeel
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 16 May 2025, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim against the second named respondent should not be struck out. The tribunal said this was because of the claimant's failure to comply with the direction of 15 January 2025 and because the claim against the second respondent had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Bright ordered that the claim against the second named respondent, Rontec Roadside Retail, be struck out. The judgment states that the claimant's remaining claims remain listed for hearing on 26 and 27 June 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim against the second named respondent, Rontec Roadside Retail, because the claimant failed to comply with the tribunal's direction of 15 January 2025 and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the letter dated 16 May 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.